Shortly after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC) released me from detention last week Tuesday, I said I was going to tell
the story of my arrest especially against the backdrop of the claim by the
anti-graft agency that I was arrested on ‘’offences bordering on cyber
stalking.’’ Today, I am keeping to that pledge and stating details of all that
transpired from my arrest, detention, eventual release and what lies ahead.
How It All Began
At about 7.30am on Monday, 8th August, 2016 I heard a knock
on the door of my residence in Kubwa, Abuja. I was actually still in bed at the
time, so my wife had to attend to the door. Moments later, she came to the
bedroom to tell me that there are two men at the front door asking to see me.
She also stated that she was unsettled by their disposition. As my wife and two
children were in the house, I had no other option than to go to the door and
see what the men wanted.
Initially, I moved to the Living Room, and attempted to
speak to them through the window closest to the door. “Who are you?” and “What
can I do for you?” I asked. The men responded saying that they wanted to see
the documents for the Toyota Corrolla car that was parked outside my house.
They claimed that there were issues with the car. At this point, I noticed that
one of the men had crept to the back of the house – seemingly to ensure that I
did not escape. This immediately led me to believe that this unwelcome
visitation had nothing to do with the car.
Thinking about my next steps, I went back into the room,
asked my wife to get the car documents, then I called my next-door neighbour to
inform him of the development and the presence of the at-the-time yet-to-be
identified men that were in front of my house. I asked him to please come and
serve as a witness, as I did not believe their story. Unbeknownst to me, he was
already observing the events, as he had noticed the men creeping around the
house for quite some time. My neighbour then came out of the house, which made
me feel safe enough to do the same.
It was at this point that the men revealed their identities
as police officers on the trail of a stolen Toyota Corrolla car. They said a
man had claimed ownership of the car, and they wanted to verify his claim. We
were in the middle of this discussion when a Toyota Hilux truck with Police
numbering and carrying two heavily armed policemen drove into the compound.
When my wife came out of the house with the original car
papers, one of the police officers flipped through the pages, stepped aside to
place a phone call to a person that he claimed was his ‘Oga’, then came back
into the compound to tell me that the car owner was on his way with his own
original documents. We all agreed to wait to verify which of the ‘original’
documents were in fact ‘original’.
A few minutes later, a white Bus with two armed policemen
and two men in casual dressing drove into the premises and told the other
officers that they could now start their work. While we were still at this, one
of my neighbours informed me that there was another armed officer stationed
outside the compound. It was also at this point that I got to know that some of
the men present were in fact EFCC operatives who had passed the night in a
nearby estate – simply to ensure that they kept a close tab on my activities.
Another of the men had earlier revealed to me that they had been on my trail
describing the car I drove, the clothes that I wore and the places I visited
three days preceding my arrest. They actually stalked me for several days prior
to my arrest.
At this point, I requested that the men formally identify
themselves, and one of them told me that he was an EFCC operative with a search
warrant to look around my house. He also added that I was under arrest. A basic
perusal of the warrant showed that I was being arrested for ‘Offensive
Publications’ against the EFCC and its staff.
Before I allowed the men to execute the search warrant, I
demand that the three operatives that were elected to conduct the search were
first searched – in order to ensure that they did not plant any incriminating
evidence in my home.
During the search, the men turned my entire house upside
down and searched every nook and cranny. All this happened in the presence of
the neighbour, whom I had requested to be present. While this search was going
on, the armed policemen who accompanied the EFCC operatives positioned
themselves at every corner outside my house and within the premises, leaving my
neighbours wondering what could have been my offence.
At the end of the search, the operatives confiscated my two
phones, my laptop, my mobile internet device (mifi), the complimentary cards in
my possession, and other items that were clearly unrelated to the spurious
offence that they were charging me with. The operatives then took a record of
all the items that they had confiscated, hauled me into the Toyota bus, and
took me to the EFCC Headquarters in Wuse 2, Abuja.
My Alleged Offence
When the men first came to knock on my door, they alleged
that the Toyota Corrola car which belongs to my wife was a stolen car. This
changed to what they called ‘offensive publication’ as indicated in the search
warrant they produced, but when they eventually released a press statement on
the same day of my arrest, they said I was being held for ‘Cyber Stalking.’
It is important to note that in all these, the EFCC failed
to specify who or what I was ‘stalking.’ They didn’t even explain to me the
details of the ‘cyber stalking’ allegation and what the specific crimes were
and till this day, nobody has said anything to me in clear terms what my
offence is. It was only at the moment they showed me the search warrant that I
was able to deduce that my arrest was in regards to some publications that I
had made on my blog abusidiqu.com particularly about the head of the anti-graft
commission. The search warrant said ‘offensive publications against EFCC and
its staff, but this is clearly not true. They were Ibrahim Lamorde and Ibrahim
Magu who incidentally headed or heads the EFCC.
Since 2015, long before the current chairman, Ibrahim Magu
was appointed to head the commission in acting capacity, abusidiqu.com
published several articles bordering on alleged corruption and complaints by
EFCC staff amongst many others. This information were very much in the public
space and was not peculiar to abusidiqu.com alone. The searchlight beamed on
Lamorde was also beamed on Magu and according to the persons who authored the
publications, they saw the need to inform the public of what was happening
under the Magu-led leadership of the commission. Contrary to the erroneous
impression they may have tried to create, the publications were never about
EFCC as an institution neither were they against the staff of the commission.
They were about Lamorde and Magu in their individual capacity as heads of the
commission.
What is even of more concern is that the EFCC knows that I
did not author these publications. They know and have sufficient proofs of who
the authors were. I only provided them the platform as a blogger to enable them
air their concerns, the same way I have done to so many others including those
who have written positively about Lamorde, Magu and the EFCC. Thankfully, one
of the authors has come out boldly to say that she authored the articles.
I have asked times without number why Magu feels he should
be a judge in his own case by using the EFCC to want to intimidate and harass
people because he heads the commission. What has the EFCC got to do with
publications that is about him as an individual? At best, the EFCC’s
involvement should simply have been to investigate the issues raised by the
authors in the articles that I published. If the organization is supposed to be
acting on information provided by whistle blowers, is this not a perfect
opportunity for the EFCC to investigate Magu, not minding that he is the head
the commission? If these publications were to be about a junior staff of EFCC
for example, will the commission also be the one to effect arrest on behalf the
junior officer? For me, this is just a clear case of using privileged position
for the purpose of harassment and intimidation.
My Stay In EFCC Detention
I spent about 36 hours in the custody of the EFCC. The
better part of this time was spent during interrogation. They were practically
asking me questions they already have answers to. They asked to know if the
publications mostly dating back to 2015 were published on abusidiqu.com. They
also showed me print outs of the emails which contained the information the
authors of the publications sent to me requesting for publishing space. If they
already know all this, then what was my arrest for? Perhaps, they wanted
something more, reason why they are still keeping all the items they
confiscated from my house. As I write this, the EFCC is still holding onto my
phones, laptops, internet device and other unrelated documents. They told me
clearly that they are going to subject them to forensic analysis which I
believe is in breach of my privacy.
What Next
From the above narration, it is clear to me that Magu’s EFCC
is in clear violation of the law. Aside granting me bail, they refused to say
anything else and have continued to keep possession of my properties many of
which contain my private information. So I proceeded to the court for the
enforcement of my Fundamental Rights which the EFCC is in clear breach of. My
lawyers have informed me that the commission has been duly served and we are
now awaiting the court to commence the case.
Abubakar ‘Abusidiq’ Usman
Comments
Post a Comment
Leave a comment
Pls Note:Views expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not reflect or represent that of Naijacynth